January 9, 2025
Customer trust is no longer built only through brand reputation, relationships, or a good product. Increasingly, customers want evidence that the organizations they work with can protect data, manage cybersecurity risk, meet compliance obligations, respond to incidents, support accessibility, govern emerging technologies, and operate responsibly. In this Hotman Group session, Cheri Hotman and Sarah discuss how customer trust has evolved into a business requirement — and why security, compliance, transparency, and operational readiness can directly affect revenue.
Cheri and Sarah explore the evolution of customer trust, third-party risk, cybersecurity and compliance due diligence, regulatory pressure, digital accessibility, AI governance, customer questionnaires, trust centers, compliance monitoring, operational efficiency, and why organizations need scalable ways to demonstrate that they can be trusted.
Customer trust in the digital age is the confidence that an organization can responsibly protect information, manage risk, meet its obligations, operate its products and services reliably, and provide credible evidence of those practices when customers ask.
That confidence increasingly affects whether customers can purchase from a vendor in the first place.
Security questionnaires, SOC 2 reports, certifications, privacy requirements, accessibility expectations, AI governance, contract terms, third-party risk assessments, and other assurance activities are therefore not simply compliance overhead. They have become part of the customer experience and, for many organizations, part of the sales process.
Customer trust has expanded beyond whether a company keeps its promises or provides good service.
Customers increasingly want to know:
In other words, customers are evaluating not only the product they are buying but the organization behind it.
Organizations rely on interconnected ecosystems of cloud providers, software companies, consultants, managed service providers, data processors, infrastructure partners, and other third parties.
That means a customer’s security posture is influenced by organizations outside its own walls.
As a result, sophisticated customers increasingly apply a “trust but verify” approach. A vendor may say that it takes cybersecurity seriously, but customers want evidence that those statements are supported by real controls and operating practices.
This is one reason strong cybersecurity risk management matters beyond internal security. The organization’s ability to understand and manage risk influences the confidence customers can place in it.
Security and compliance can become part of the buying decision before the purchase order is issued.
A sales team may convince the prospect that the product solves the business problem. Legal may negotiate the commercial terms. Pricing may be agreed.
Then the deal reaches cybersecurity, compliance, procurement, privacy, or third-party risk review.
If the vendor cannot get through the customer’s trust requirements, the product may never be purchased.
That is why cybersecurity should not automatically be viewed as pure overhead. For many companies, security and compliance are part of revenue enablement.
Customers themselves face cybersecurity, privacy, operational resilience, regulatory, contractual, and governance obligations.
If a vendor supports a critical business process or handles sensitive information, that vendor can affect the customer’s ability to meet those obligations.
The customer’s due diligence is therefore not simply curiosity. It may be part of how that customer demonstrates that it has appropriately evaluated third-party risk.
Regulatory obligations often begin with one organization and then influence requirements throughout its vendor ecosystem.
If a regulated company must demonstrate that it manages third-party technology risk, it may need stronger contractual terms, more vendor documentation, additional evidence, or more detailed risk assessments from the organizations supporting it.
One example discussed in the session is the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act, or DORA. DORA has applied since January 17, 2025 and places significant emphasis on ICT risk and third-party technology dependencies in the financial sector.
The broader lesson applies beyond any single regulation: your customer’s requirements can become your requirements through contracts, procurement standards, and third-party risk expectations.
Third-party risk management asks a basic question:
“What risk are we introducing by relying on this vendor?”
Customers may evaluate a vendor’s security controls, privacy practices, business continuity, incident response, financial stability, regulatory compliance, certifications, data handling, subcontractors, and other areas before approving the relationship.
For the vendor, that means customer trust is partly the ability to provide credible answers and evidence without creating unnecessary delay in the buying process.
A secure product matters, but customers often look beyond product functionality.
They may ask:
Those questions reveal something important: customer trust is often a reflection of the entire security and GRC operating model, not one certification or security feature.
Digital accessibility means designing digital products, services, websites, interfaces, and related experiences so that people with disabilities can use them.
That includes more than vision or hearing differences.
Accessibility can also involve:
Accessibility has also become increasingly relevant to product compliance. In the EU, the European Accessibility Act began applying on June 28, 2025 to specified products and services.
For organizations selling digital products, accessibility can therefore affect not only inclusion and usability but customer expectations, contracting, compliance, and trust.
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines organize accessibility around four foundational principles. Digital content and interfaces should be:
Users need a way to perceive the information being presented, including people who cannot rely on a particular sense such as vision or hearing.
Users need to be able to operate the interface and navigate its functionality.
Information and interface behavior need to be understandable.
Content should work reliably with current and future user tools, including assistive technologies.
They can if accessibility is not considered during design.
Sarah uses multifactor authentication and CAPTCHA challenges as examples.
An authentication workflow may require someone to:
For some users, that workflow may create substantial barriers.
The answer is not to remove necessary security. It is to consider security and accessibility together during design so that one requirement does not unnecessarily undermine the other.
AI is creating a new category of customer questions.
Customers may want to understand:
Because many organizations are still maturing their own AI governance, requests can sometimes swing between extremes — unrestricted adoption on one side and broad prohibitions on the other.
A more sustainable approach is to define the organization’s own AI governance, establish appropriate boundaries and controls, and be able to explain that approach clearly to customers.
A vendor cannot consistently answer customer AI questions if employees across the organization have no shared standard for how AI is supposed to be used.
An enterprise AI policy can establish:
Once that internal position is clear, customer commitments can be evaluated against something real instead of negotiated from scratch every time.
The first step is to build and operate the programs the customer is asking about.
Your answers should come from those programs.
Customer trust should be an output of how the organization operates — not a story invented every time a questionnaire arrives.
If the organization has defined controls, owners, policies, evidence, monitoring, certifications, risk processes, and governance, much of the customer-trust response already exists.
The operational challenge then becomes organizing and delivering that information efficiently.
They should strongly consider making appropriate high-level information easy for customers to find.
A public security, compliance, or trust page might identify:
Sensitive reports and evidence can still remain behind appropriate confidentiality controls.
The objective is to remove unnecessary friction by making the basic trust posture visible before a customer has to ask.
Customer requirements often change because the environment around the customer has changed.
A new regulation, enforcement trend, framework, contractual requirement, accessibility rule, AI expectation, or supply-chain requirement can create new questions with relatively little warning.
Organizations therefore need ways to monitor both:
Monitoring early gives the organization time to plan instead of discovering a major requirement in the final days of an important deal.
Yes — but technology needs the right process around it.
Tools may help organizations:
But Cheri and Sarah emphasize a familiar problem: buying a tool does not automatically create an effective process.
Organizations should choose GRC technology based on the operating problem they are solving and then invest in implementation, ownership, governance, and adoption.
Security questionnaires sometimes require deep subject-matter expertise, but not every question requires a senior security professional to manually research and rewrite the answer.
When highly skilled people repeatedly answer the same basic questions, the organization incurs opportunity cost.
Those experts are not spending that time on:
A mature customer-trust operation uses standardized information, workflows, technology, and appropriate delegation while reserving expert involvement for the questions that actually require judgment.
Identify who owns security, compliance, privacy, legal review, accessibility, AI governance, customer assurance, and the other areas customers ask about.
Create repeatable workflows for questionnaires, assurance reports, attestations, contract requests, approvals, customer escalations, and regulatory changes.
Use tools where they reduce unnecessary manual work, improve monitoring, centralize evidence, automate workflows, or make trusted information easier for customers and internal teams to access.
There is no final version of customer trust.
Customer expectations change. Regulations change. Technology changes. Security threats change. Products change. New markets create new obligations.
Organizations will rarely have enough people, money, or time to implement every improvement at once.
The goal is therefore incremental improvement: identify friction, prioritize the highest-value changes, make the process more efficient, and continue maturing the program.
Customer trust is confidence that a vendor can responsibly protect information, manage cybersecurity risk, operate appropriate controls, meet relevant obligations, and provide credible evidence of those practices.
Many customers perform security and compliance due diligence before approving a vendor. If the vendor cannot satisfy those requirements, the deal may be delayed or lost even when the product itself meets the customer’s business needs.
Security questionnaires help customers evaluate whether a vendor’s controls, processes, and risk practices meet their own security, compliance, regulatory, and third-party risk expectations.
A customer trust center or security page provides centralized information about the organization’s security and compliance posture. It may include certifications, assurance information, policies, privacy resources, and a process for requesting protected documentation.
Digital accessibility affects whether people with disabilities can use a company’s products and services. It can also affect customer requirements, product compliance, contracting, usability, and the organization’s ability to serve a broader customer population.
Customers increasingly want to understand whether and how vendors use AI, what information is involved, what controls are in place, how employees are governed, and whether appropriate human oversight and risk management exist.
Organizations can scale customer trust by centralizing evidence, creating reusable approved answers, implementing repeatable workflows, publishing appropriate security information, monitoring regulatory changes, using automation selectively, and reserving subject-matter experts for questions that truly require their judgment.
No. Customer requirements, regulations, technology, risks, and business models continually change. Customer trust needs ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement just like the cybersecurity and compliance programs supporting it.
This article is based on the Hotman Group session Building Customer Trust in the Digital Age: Evolution, Importance, and Observations from the Field, featuring Cheri Hotman and Sarah.
The conversation explores how security, compliance, regulation, third-party risk, accessibility, AI, transparency, and customer assurance increasingly affect vendor relationships and revenue.
It also examines practical ways organizations can operationalize customer trust through stronger underlying programs, compliance monitoring, appropriate technology, reusable processes, public trust information, and continuous improvement.
Organizations often bring in Hotman Group when customer trust requirements are beginning to create operational friction or block growth. HG can help when:
Hotman Group helps organizations build and operate cybersecurity and Cyber GRC programs that create credible answers to customer questions — while connecting security, risk, compliance, evidence, technology, and business strategy.
Hotman Group is a cybersecurity and Cyber GRC professional-services firm that helps organizations diagnose, design, build, remediate, implement, operate and mature cybersecurity programs. HG provides hands-on vCISO and vGRC leadership, supports multi-framework environments, and helps organizations select and implement GRC technology while connecting cybersecurity decisions to business risk and strategy.
Hotman Group helps organizations build the security, risk, compliance, evidence, governance, and operating practices behind customer assurance so that trust is supported by how the business actually operates.
The goal is not simply to answer the next questionnaire. It is to create a cybersecurity and GRC program capable of supporting customers, reducing risk, improving operational efficiency, and enabling growth.